TC next year

[anon-4394]

Good article about next year. Looks positive that Jay and Dan are aligned on a tax cut for residents. Looks like it will happen. Interested to see what Matt and Mike do on the Traffic issue.


http://www.centraljersey.com/news/the_cranbury_press/taylor-will-assume-mayor-s-role-in-cranbury-looks-forward/article_f1e4f892-20aa-5752-b2bd-b9c199e702b2.html

[anon-000s]

What steps will Jay implement to make the TC run like a well-oiled machine?

[anon-7666]

[anon-81p8]

Sweet. A former Republican appoints his bff Republican as deputy.

[anon-454r]

He also names two indivisible members who went after him in this past election to run the Traffic Subcommittee which is probably the most important subcommittee given the investments made. And has stated they will have other key roles.

Your indivisible bias is showing that this is not enough and as stated earlier Jay doesn’t play politics and careless what the indivisible group like yourself thinks. Glenn as this years Mayor would not be Deputy. So the only other choice is Matt or Mike to stay in party. Dan is qualified. Matt and Mike are not. Mike is not even a year on TC, when Matt has made meetings he has shown he does not understand the issues yet. Jay looked at qualifications not party which is what those who are not indivisible want.

[anoqs71-0076]

The fact is that Matt and Mike do not have the experience
---their day will come; but in due time------
Lets just hope that the dismissive attitude of Dan toward the public doesn't prevail!

[anon-9soq]

How would Cranbury ever survive without local government? Who would be the keeper of the lollipop kids?

[anon-7666]

Posts like the two above are why no one wants to run for TC and why we're losing our identity.

The lollipops comment is uncalled for by any stretch. The post about Jay being a former Rep so appointing Dan based on that basis also dumb and doesn't help anything.

The TC is about helping the town as best they can and up until last year the TC went a long time without politics entering the equation or name calling. In return the town was in a good place. Instead of pushing political agendas or name calling, why not volunteer yourselves? If you don't have the time then don't say anything at all.

[anon-84p3]

[anon-7666]

When has Jay ever threatened a group with a lawsuit? Please explain this laughable comment.

[anon-42o8]

I was looking at the Indivisible Cranbury FB page to see upcoming
Meetings I might to attend and saw there was a rally at Chris smith’s office that was of interest. However, the rally was to tell him The House of Rep is now owned not by the people, but the Dem party. https://m.facebook.com/indivisiblecranbury/. The post says who’s house? Our house!

As a life long Dem this isn’t the way to represent the voters, but a way to further divide and say party is all that matters which is why we’re in the state we are. The Dem party was always about voices and dialogue.

I then compare it to our TC and what I heard from the reorg meeting where the TC was bipartisan putting town first. Dan a Rep nominated Jay a Dem (yes a few nutty posters will say he’s not) for Mayor with everyone supporting it. (Matt I heard came late).

Jay nominated Dan for Deputy Mayor and Glenn the Dem party chair backed it, while Mike abstained from supporting Dan.

Then for Planning Board Nancy witt was appointed. It is nice to see a qualified person appointed over party. That she is a woman should make the CRC supporters happy so a good win for everyone.

I am glad our local TC for the most part is avoiding party politics and I am hopeful that Mike abstaining is a one and done. Good job TC.

[abstain-3234]

An abstention? Was an explanation for the abstention provided?

[anon-4307]

My understanding from hearing this is that no explanation was given as to why.

[anon-572n]

[anon-s316]

[anon-572n]