View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
anon-61q7 Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
anon-0115 Guest
|
Posted: Thu, Mar 26 2020, 3:59 pm EDT Post subject: Re: 2nd case reported @ Cranbury |
|
|
If your are from NYC, please stay at home for at least 14 days. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest Guest
|
Posted: Fri, Mar 27 2020, 11:17 am EDT Post subject: Re: 2nd case reported @ Cranbury |
|
|
Cranbury is a 4 so far. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anon-61q7 Guest
|
Posted: Fri, Mar 27 2020, 4:45 pm EDT Post subject: Re: 2nd case reported @ Cranbury |
|
|
MIDDLESEX COUNTY (640 cases, 127 new as of Friday, with 9 deaths)
• Carteret: 10
• Dunellen: 4
• Cranbury: 5
• East Brunswick: 37
• Edison: 42
• Helmetta: 3
• Highland Park: 12
• Jamesburg: 4
• Metuchen: 2
• Middlesex: 6
• Monroe: 30
• New Brunswick: 15
• North Brunswick: 16
• Old Bridge : 45
• Perth Amboy: 25
• Piscataway: 31
• Plainsboro: 8
• Sayreville: 26
• South Amboy: 10
• South Brunswick: 18
• South Plainfield: 6
• South River: 7
• Spotswood: 4
• Woodbridge: 39. Mayor John McCormac said 29 of the cases are associated with St. Joseph’s nursing home. There were also three deaths of nursing home residents, but they are not being listed as Woodbridge’s deaths because they died after they were moved to CareOne in Whippany. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CURIOUS-r7pn Guest
|
Posted: Fri, Mar 27 2020, 5:42 pm EDT Post subject: Re: 2nd case reported @ Cranbury |
|
|
WHY DONT THEY POST HOW MANY GOT BETTER? WHY DOES IT HAVE TO ONLY BE THE BAD AND NEGATIVE? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
they do-3234 Guest
|
Posted: Sat, Mar 28 2020, 8:18 am EDT Post subject: Re: 2nd case reported @ Cranbury |
|
|
Experts continually message that the large majority of cases are mild or result in recovery. Confirmed cases minus confired deaths = # of recoveries. Problem is that none of these numbers will ever be accurate because we'll never have a full measure of actual cases.
Stay well everyone. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anon-0115 Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|