| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
anon-sos1
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun, Sep 26 2021, 6:33 pm EDT Post subject: Cranbury's vaccination rate |
 |
|
As of Sunday evening, September 26, the state Department of Health's COVID-19 Dashboard shows Cranbury Township's vaccination rate as follows:
At least one dose
All Ages: 83% (Four weeks ago: 88%)
12 and over: 93% (Four weeks ago: 98%)
18 and over: 99% (Four weeks ago: 105%)
30 and over: 98% (Four weeks ago: 105%)
65 and over: 119% (Four weeks ago: 123%)
Vaccine course complete
All Ages: 78% (Four weeks ago: 81%)
12 and over: 87% (Four weeks ago: 91%)
18 and over: 93% (Four weeks ago: 98%)
30 and over: 92% (Four weeks ago: 98%)
65 and over: 111% (Four weeks ago: 114%)
The webpage includes a footnote:
"Select municipalities may observe more than 100% vaccine coverage due to multiple reasons: transient persons (i.e., people who have moved), those who are traveling and not residing in their home where the census counted them, students who may select their student residence for vaccination data, persons in long-term care (or other facility-based housing outside of the home) which might be counted in a different location for the census, and other reasons" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anon-opr0
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun, Sep 26 2021, 8:39 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Cranbury's vaccination rate |
|
|
| The footnote explains why the rate can be over 100% but not why so many of the percentages have actually reduced versus 4 weeks ago. How do we have a negative trend of people getting unvaccinated apparently? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-sos1
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Sep 27 2021, 4:29 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Cranbury's vaccination rate |
|
|
| I had the same question. My best guess is that the Department of Health or some other authority is making an ongoing effort to correct the data for these big over-counts we're seeing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-p3o1
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon, Sep 27 2021, 7:24 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Cranbury's vaccination rate |
|
|
| Who cares |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-7p9n
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Oct 27 2021, 11:48 am EDT Post subject: Re: Cranbury's vaccination rate |
|
|
| I highly doubt these numbers are accurate. This from someone who has not been vaccinated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-pp76
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Oct 27 2021, 8:16 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Cranbury's vaccination rate |
|
|
| Who cares |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-1ror
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed, Oct 27 2021, 9:15 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Cranbury's vaccination rate |
|
|
| I could care less who is vaccinated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anon-sos1
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat, Oct 30 2021, 6:12 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Cranbury's vaccination rate |
|
|
| anon-pp76 wrote: | | Who cares |
| anon-p3o1 wrote: | | Who cares |
Higher vaccination rates are needed to reduce deaths, improve economic performance, and reduce restrictive COVID-19 public health measures. Many people care about the vaccination rate in part because they consider these things to be desirable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
