Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Guest"][quote="Susan Goetz"]Hello -I am looking forward to answering any questions the people of Cranbury have about my position on this or any other issue of concern at tomorrow night's Candidate's night (8PM, Cranbury School). I have already researched this issue and have made my position on the free standing library clear since very early in my campaign. If we haven't met in person and chatted about this yet, I believe each of you will be receiving a letter from me in the next day or two with a clear statement about this and other concerns that have been brought to my attention while I have been campaigning for Township Committee. This is what my letter says about the issue: [quote]Library – A library can be a community treasure and I will personally contribute to its development. Nevertheless, as your TC rep, I can not support public funding of a new library as a component of our Township budget. I do, however, support the dedication of public land as identified in the Master Plan for the library’s construction I also thank the group committed to this aggressive fund raising and urge everyone to take the time to understand this effort.[/quote] I continue to welcome your questions and concerns about this and any other issue affecting your life in Cranbury. I invite you to visit my website ([url]www.susangoetz.com[/url]) or contact me if you have any additional questions. Thank you for this opportunity to present my position. - Susan Goetz[/quote] Thank you Susan. I appreciate you coming on this site in an attempt to put this issue to rest. I still don't understand why people are so confused about this.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Thu, Oct 13 2011, 4:44 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
The Brainerd Braulers
Guest
Posted: Thu, Oct 13 2011, 3:29 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
Perfect ballfield for a semi-pro team.
The Cranbury Colonials!
Guest
Posted: Wed, Oct 12 2011, 8:12 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
Guest wrote:
Speaking of that Babe Ruth field it's nice to see that it's never used.
And only Win didn't want to screw us by raising taxes and the school spends too much money and the Democrats were trying to rule the world and spend all our money on unnecessary projects when they controlled the TC and they almost wasted our money buying the PNC Bank site to build the library and they wasted our money cleaning up a downed tree and replacing the public sidewalk, etc. etc.
There. Got it out of your system yet?
Do you really think its clever or funny or somehow relevant to recycle things that have been discussed at length here already?
Guest
Posted: Wed, Oct 12 2011, 6:02 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
Speaking of that Babe Ruth field it's nice to see that it's never used.
Guest
Posted: Wed, Oct 12 2011, 7:47 am EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
This is one poster people who is just trying to cause trouble. I'm personally not in support of a new library but this person is an utter cretin. Nothing anyone writes will garner a credible response because they clearly don't care about reality, just slinging crap.
Guest
Posted: Wed, Oct 12 2011, 7:43 am EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
That money is legally theirs. If they feel a stand alone library is important then it will be used to that purpose. I don't think a new library isn't any stretch a need, but many people do who are not on the board. So the chances are zero that they will stop the process and hand back the surplus.
No that money is the residents A.K.A the taxpayers of Cranbury
You're splitting hairs over semantics. The point their were making is the state mandates minimum funding to the library and that's where that money comes from.
LOL 600k is what you call minimum funding, for a library in a town with under 4000 people LOL
Are you an idiot or just as ass? The key phrase was "state mandated." You can complain all you want but you're focused on the wrong government body. The state defined how much the library got, not Cranbury. Cranbury Library receives the absolute least amount the state allows it to get from taxpayers. You can like it or not but stop acting like we have a choice. I suspect you knew this and are just trying to chum the waters, which makes you an ass. But I leave open the small possibility you don't know how to read and are merely dumb.
Guest
Posted: Tue, Oct 11 2011, 5:32 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
I was told by one of the attendees that fine wine and filet mignon were served at the event along with a live band and dancing. Must be nice to have a 600k tax payer funded slush fund.
Guest wrote:
Look here the library board held an offsite retreat with the giant 600k slush fund they have created with our taxes. I wonder what that cost us. oh wait I meant the library with our tax money. Oh look at the notes below how they hired consultants and did study's to help raise money for the new library. I guess that also without regard they were using money taken from tax payers for running a library. I do not remember the charter of the library to be to pay consultants to study building a new library or to pay consultants on how to raise money for a new library. Smells like a misuse of our taxes and corruption to me.
Why is no one investigating this misuse of funds?
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CRANBURY PUBLIC LIBRARY
RETREAT MINUTES
January 16, 2010
Meadow Lakes, Hightstown, NJ
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT at 9:25 am
Pursuant to the provisions of the Open Public Meeting Act, adequate notice of this meeting has been provided by the Library Director as follows: On December 15, 2009, a notice for this meeting was sent to the Cranbury Press, Home News Tribune, and Township Clerk and posted in the Public Library.
2. INTRODUCTION OF BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Kirstie Venanzi, President
Hal Rourke, Vice-President
Patty Thomsson, Treasurer
Kim Borden, Secretary
David Fletcher
Andre Mento
Charlene Vivian-Granville
Julie Hardaker, Chief School Administrator and FCPL Representative
Pam Parseghian, Mayor’s Representative
Also present:
Marilynn Mullen, Director
Jan Murphy, Youth and Community Outreach Librarian
Doug Baldwin, Systems Administrator
For Foundation Presentation (12:15-1:15pm):
Pat Demers
3. WELCOME BY BOARD PRESIDENT: Kirstie
4. REVIEWS OF 2009
A. Director’s Annual Report/Progress Against Operational Goals 2009: Marilynn
B. Board’s Review of 2009/2010 Goals: Kirstie
1. Items from 2009 that Need More Attention:
• Offer orientation support for new Trustees. Continue to provide updated Trustee’s manual, which new trustees find to be a good resource.
• Evaluate and continue implementation of Strategic Plan.
Page 2 of 3
2. Items Revised/Added/Deleted for 2010:
• Delete “Ensure timely completion of all Library strategic and annual goals, all monthly and yearly financial reporting and to act on any audit recommendations.”
• Add “Ensure timely completion of annual audit and all monthly and yearly financial reporting. Act on all audit recommendations.”
• Revise “Encourage suggestions . . .” bullet to “Encourage suggestions and interactions with the staff, Friends of the Cranbury Public Library, Cranbury Library Foundation and other supporters.”
• Change “Township Planner” to “Planning Board” on “Continue communication with . . .” bullet.
• Change “begin” to “continue” on “Evaluate and begin implementation of Strategic Plan.”
• Change “Establish formal” to “Maintain” on “Establish formal public and community relations initiative and policy.”
• Change “Establish a Library Foundation” to “Ongoing support of the Cranbury Library Foundation.”
5. OPERATIONAL GOALS FOR 2010: Marilynn
A. Director and Board of Trustees Goals Section
1. Add
• Complete conceptual architectural drawings and associated cost estimates of the new freestanding facility which will encompass the library.
6. FOUNDATION PRESENTATION: Janice Roddenbery
A. Janice specializes in capital campaigns for small and mid-sized organizations.
B. Explanation of Capital Campaign Feasibility Study Process
1. This takes 3 months, start to finish.
2. A planning study is the first step of a capital campaign – this planning study is called a Campaign Feasibility Study. It is recommended that outside consultants be used for confidentiality and their experience.
3. The purpose of the study is to determine if the project is viable. It also sets a dollar goal and a timeframe. In addition, it determines what aspects of the projects are of greatest interest to the community. These aspects are used to develop the Case Statement. The Case Statement is the case for support.
4. An additional purpose is to identify major donors. Potential volunteers and campaign leadership are also identified during this phase.
5. This is also an opportunity to gather information on issues and concerns in the community.
6. The Feasibility Study demonstrates good planning and this builds community confidence. It also helps potential donors feel like part of the process.
7. A list is developed of individuals to be asked to be interviewed – Friends of the Library, Foundation Board, Mayor, corporate leaders, business association leaders, etc. 60 individuals are invited for 40-45 interviews.
8. Next the questionnaire is developed. Some questions are standard but more customized content questions are also added.
9. Finally, a letter is sent to the 60 interviewees and then the interviews take place and a mid-term report is prepared. The interviews are then completed and the final report is prepared and a presentation is given.
Page 3 of 3
C. Main Steps in a Capital Campaign
1. Form a campaign steering committee and select steering committee leadership.
2. Decide on a dollar goal and timeframe.
3. Name the campaign.
4. Formulate the case for support.
5. Develop named gift opportunities.
6. Develop solicitation documents for initial or “silent” phase for the nucleus fund.
7. Develop a list of major gift prospects then rate and screen these.
8. Plan donor cultivation events.
9. Train volunteers on gift solicitation.
10. Reevaluate the dollar goal and timeframe after the silent phase (i.e., 1/3 of funds in 6-8 months).
11. Publish campaign brochure and plan campaign kick-off.
12. Recruit volunteers for a broader committee of volunteers.
13. Work through rated prospects.
14. Execute a general campaign at the end (bricks, etc.) to finish up.
7. SUMMARY BY BOARD PRESIDENT: Kirstie
8. ADJOURNMENT @ 1:50 pm
Respectfully submitted,
Kim Borden
Guest
Posted: Tue, Oct 11 2011, 5:31 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
OK that's it. Look replying to this guy just encourages him. The last post indicates that he is either a complete crackpot, or a guy that just likes to drive other people crazy.
This forum has been over this issue ad vomitum. There is nothing new here. Please stop feeding this particular troll.
Guest
Posted: Tue, Oct 11 2011, 4:09 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
Look here the library board held an offsite retreat with the giant 600k slush fund they have created with our taxes. I wonder what that cost us. oh wait I meant the library with our tax money. Oh look at the notes below how they hired consultants and did study's to help raise money for the new library. I guess that also without regard they were using money taken from tax payers for running a library. I do not remember the charter of the library to be to pay consultants to study building a new library or to pay consultants on how to raise money for a new library. Smells like a misuse of our taxes and corruption to me.
Why is no one investigating this misuse of funds?
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CRANBURY PUBLIC LIBRARY
RETREAT MINUTES
January 16, 2010
Meadow Lakes, Hightstown, NJ
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT at 9:25 am
Pursuant to the provisions of the Open Public Meeting Act, adequate notice of this meeting has been provided by the Library Director as follows: On December 15, 2009, a notice for this meeting was sent to the Cranbury Press, Home News Tribune, and Township Clerk and posted in the Public Library.
2. INTRODUCTION OF BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Kirstie Venanzi, President
Hal Rourke, Vice-President
Patty Thomsson, Treasurer
Kim Borden, Secretary
David Fletcher
Andre Mento
Charlene Vivian-Granville
Julie Hardaker, Chief School Administrator and FCPL Representative
Pam Parseghian, Mayor’s Representative
Also present:
Marilynn Mullen, Director
Jan Murphy, Youth and Community Outreach Librarian
Doug Baldwin, Systems Administrator
For Foundation Presentation (12:15-1:15pm):
Pat Demers
3. WELCOME BY BOARD PRESIDENT: Kirstie
4. REVIEWS OF 2009
A. Director’s Annual Report/Progress Against Operational Goals 2009: Marilynn
B. Board’s Review of 2009/2010 Goals: Kirstie
1. Items from 2009 that Need More Attention:
• Offer orientation support for new Trustees. Continue to provide updated Trustee’s manual, which new trustees find to be a good resource.
• Evaluate and continue implementation of Strategic Plan.
Page 2 of 3
2. Items Revised/Added/Deleted for 2010:
• Delete “Ensure timely completion of all Library strategic and annual goals, all monthly and yearly financial reporting and to act on any audit recommendations.”
• Add “Ensure timely completion of annual audit and all monthly and yearly financial reporting. Act on all audit recommendations.”
• Revise “Encourage suggestions . . .” bullet to “Encourage suggestions and interactions with the staff, Friends of the Cranbury Public Library, Cranbury Library Foundation and other supporters.”
• Change “Township Planner” to “Planning Board” on “Continue communication with . . .” bullet.
• Change “begin” to “continue” on “Evaluate and begin implementation of Strategic Plan.”
• Change “Establish formal” to “Maintain” on “Establish formal public and community relations initiative and policy.”
• Change “Establish a Library Foundation” to “Ongoing support of the Cranbury Library Foundation.”
5. OPERATIONAL GOALS FOR 2010: Marilynn
A. Director and Board of Trustees Goals Section
1. Add
• Complete conceptual architectural drawings and associated cost estimates of the new freestanding facility which will encompass the library.
6. FOUNDATION PRESENTATION: Janice Roddenbery
A. Janice specializes in capital campaigns for small and mid-sized organizations.
B. Explanation of Capital Campaign Feasibility Study Process
1. This takes 3 months, start to finish.
2. A planning study is the first step of a capital campaign – this planning study is called a Campaign Feasibility Study. It is recommended that outside consultants be used for confidentiality and their experience.
3. The purpose of the study is to determine if the project is viable. It also sets a dollar goal and a timeframe. In addition, it determines what aspects of the projects are of greatest interest to the community. These aspects are used to develop the Case Statement. The Case Statement is the case for support.
4. An additional purpose is to identify major donors. Potential volunteers and campaign leadership are also identified during this phase.
5. This is also an opportunity to gather information on issues and concerns in the community.
6. The Feasibility Study demonstrates good planning and this builds community confidence. It also helps potential donors feel like part of the process.
7. A list is developed of individuals to be asked to be interviewed – Friends of the Library, Foundation Board, Mayor, corporate leaders, business association leaders, etc. 60 individuals are invited for 40-45 interviews.
8. Next the questionnaire is developed. Some questions are standard but more customized content questions are also added.
9. Finally, a letter is sent to the 60 interviewees and then the interviews take place and a mid-term report is prepared. The interviews are then completed and the final report is prepared and a presentation is given.
Page 3 of 3
C. Main Steps in a Capital Campaign
1. Form a campaign steering committee and select steering committee leadership.
2. Decide on a dollar goal and timeframe.
3. Name the campaign.
4. Formulate the case for support.
5. Develop named gift opportunities.
6. Develop solicitation documents for initial or “silent” phase for the nucleus fund.
7. Develop a list of major gift prospects then rate and screen these.
8. Plan donor cultivation events.
9. Train volunteers on gift solicitation.
10. Reevaluate the dollar goal and timeframe after the silent phase (i.e., 1/3 of funds in 6-8 months).
11. Publish campaign brochure and plan campaign kick-off.
12. Recruit volunteers for a broader committee of volunteers.
13. Work through rated prospects.
14. Execute a general campaign at the end (bricks, etc.) to finish up.
7. SUMMARY BY BOARD PRESIDENT: Kirstie
8. ADJOURNMENT @ 1:50 pm
Respectfully submitted,
Kim Borden
Guest
Posted: Tue, Oct 11 2011, 3:50 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
The library is allowed to return the $600,000 back to the taxpayers. They are choosing to use it for a stand alone library.
Does anyone know how the library board members are selected?
That is not correct. The money is in capital. Capital money cannot be returned.
The library before moving money to capital could return money, but that is still their money now. As soon as you paid your tax bill you lost it. If you really care and aren't just a troll then go to a library board meeting. Complaining here will not help.
Its amazing how they can justify taking our taxes and using for what they see fit. Yes of course its capital money and cannot be returned. Well that capital money is still from every taxpayer in Cranbury and now the money is sitting in a bank account waiting for the board of the cranbury library to use the slush fund they have created as they see fit. Smells like corruption to me fellow cranbury residents.
Guest
Posted: Tue, Oct 11 2011, 3:47 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
Guest wrote:
The town can't say howuch goes to the library. Once the residents pay taxes the money is legally theirs to use as they see fit. There is nothing we as tax payees can do. We are legally obligated to pay according to the state formula and the library is entitled to use it in their interest. So yes it's tax payer money, but legally owned by the library.
So the people on the library board are the ones who have decided to take our taxes and build a giant slush fund? Who are these people? Maybe more of us should be aware of who is on the library board and the giant slush fund they have of over 6ook of our tax money.
Guest
Posted: Tue, Oct 11 2011, 3:45 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
Guest wrote:
The library is allowed to return the $600,000 back to the taxpayers. They are choosing to use it for a stand alone library.
Does anyone know how the library board members are selected?
That is not correct. The money is in capital. Capital money cannot be returned.
The library before moving money to capital could return money, but that is still their money now. As soon as you paid your tax bill you lost it. If you really care and aren't just a troll then go to a library board meeting. Complaining here will not help.
Guest
Posted: Tue, Oct 11 2011, 3:42 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
That money is legally theirs. If they feel a stand alone library is important then it will be used to that purpose. I don't think a new library isn't any stretch a need, but many people do who are not on the board. So the chances are zero that they will stop the process and hand back the surplus.
No that money is the residents A.K.A the taxpayers of Cranbury
You're splitting hairs over semantics. The point their were making is the state mandates minimum funding to the library and that's where that money comes from.
LOL 600k is what you call minimum funding, for a library in a town with under 4000 people LOL
Guest
Posted: Tue, Oct 11 2011, 2:58 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
The library is allowed to return the $600,000 back to the taxpayers. They are choosing to use it for a stand alone library.
Does anyone know how the library board members are selected?
Guest
Posted: Tue, Oct 11 2011, 2:37 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
The town can't say howuch goes to the library. Once the residents pay taxes the money is legally theirs to use as they see fit. There is nothing we as tax payees can do. We are legally obligated to pay according to the state formula and the library is entitled to use it in their interest. So yes it's tax payer money, but legally owned by the library.
Guest
Posted: Tue, Oct 11 2011, 2:30 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: old Wrights Roses site
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
That money is legally theirs. If they feel a stand alone library is important then it will be used to that purpose. I don't think a new library isn't any stretch a need, but many people do who are not on the board. So the chances are zero that they will stop the process and hand back the surplus.
No that money is the residents A.K.A the taxpayers of Cranbury
You're splitting hairs over semantics. The point their were making is the state mandates minimum funding to the library and that's where that money comes from.