| Author |
Message |
| anon-2163 |
 Posted: Mon, Jun 18 2018, 1:29 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
I believe it. Progressives want to unseat incumbents. That's all. They don't care if you are a republican or a democrat. If you have been at this for more than one term you are the "old guard" and they want you out. They tried to take the fast lane by inventing their own board but when that was shot down the write in campaign was a hail Mary that might have worked if they had been able to keep it under wraps. Primaries usually have very low turnouts in Cranbury, if they had been able to sneak their members in to write in, we could easily have a Ferrante/Huang ballot this fall.
It will be interesting to see what happens in November. |
|
 |
| liers huang ferrante-rqsq |
| Posted: Mon, Jun 18 2018, 11:55 am EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
Andrew Huang spoke at the Township Committee meeting to set the record straight about why he was a write-in candidate who tried to unseat Jay Taylor, the incumbent who won the contest.
Huang is a liar
Ferrante is a lier
they worked together to unseat Jay Taylor
Ferrante Huang Scott along with their indivisible group want to make cranbury be Princeton
Getting rid of Jay Taylor was the first step in their plan
they all must be stopped |
|
|
| anon-8pqp |
| Posted: Thu, Jun 14 2018, 6:36 am EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| anon-4os8 wrote: | | Election Crime-rqsq wrote: | It looks like Andrew Huang and Mike Ferrante broke election law do I report it here http://www.elec.state.nj.us
can anyone report this or does the town need to? |
Just out of curiosity, how do you establish that Ferrante broke any election laws? What do you have proof he did? Certainly not the flier since he's on record as saying he had nothing to do with it and nowhere does the flier say it's approved by his campaign. Again, what can you prove as oppose to believe? Was there some other provable action? |
Legal history is replete with stories of persons or companies turning a manageable legal problem into a more serious one by trying to hide or destroy evidence, see Watergate and Arthur Anderson/Enron for two notable examples. |
|
|
| anon-284r |
| Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 9:52 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| Proof? This is Cranbury.info. Go elsewhere for proof. |
|
|
| anon-4os8 |
| Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 7:40 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| Election Crime-rqsq wrote: | It looks like Andrew Huang and Mike Ferrante broke election law do I report it here http://www.elec.state.nj.us
can anyone report this or does the town need to? |
Just out of curiosity, how do you establish that Ferrante broke any election laws? What do you have proof he did? Certainly not the flier since he's on record as saying he had nothing to do with it and nowhere does the flier say it's approved by his campaign. Again, what can you prove as oppose to believe? Was there some other provable action? |
|
|
| anon-8720 |
| Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 6:26 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| anon-834s wrote: | | anon-284r wrote: | | Go for it! But then again... You're just a windbag anyways. |
There’s that word again.
Someone get this troll a thesaurus. |
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/windbag |
|
|
| anon-8720 |
|
|
| anon-834s |
| Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 6:10 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| anon-284r wrote: | | Go for it! But then again... You're just a windbag anyways. |
There’s that word again.
Someone get this troll a thesaurus. |
|
|
| anon-284r |
| Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 5:58 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| ⚆ _ ⚆ |
|
|
| anon-284r |
| Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 4:39 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| Go for it! But then again... You're just a windbag anyways. |
|
|
| Election Crime-rqsq |
| Posted: Wed, Jun 13 2018, 4:33 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
It looks like Andrew Huang and Mike Ferrante broke election law do I report it here http://www.elec.state.nj.us
can anyone report this or does the town need to? |
|
|
| anon-834s |
| Posted: Mon, Jun 11 2018, 5:28 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| anon-117o wrote: | | anon-834s wrote: | | anon-117o wrote: | | anon-117o wrote: |
... sneaky Indivisibles knew that not many people turn up for the primary
|
The secret is out! Low voter turnout during primaries, who knew? Thanks for the education. LOL |
It’s not a secret that was the point. Not very bright, are you? LOL. |
https://goo.gl/ZJHH69 |
Not clicking the link, did you have something to say? |
|
|
| anon-117o |
| Posted: Mon, Jun 11 2018, 5:10 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| anon-834s wrote: | | anon-117o wrote: | | anon-117o wrote: |
... sneaky Indivisibles knew that not many people turn up for the primary
|
The secret is out! Low voter turnout during primaries, who knew? Thanks for the education. LOL |
It’s not a secret that was the point. Not very bright, are you? LOL. |
https://goo.gl/ZJHH69 |
|
|
| anon-834s |
| Posted: Mon, Jun 11 2018, 5:03 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| anon-117o wrote: | | anon-117o wrote: |
... sneaky Indivisibles knew that not many people turn up for the primary
|
The secret is out! Low voter turnout during primaries, who knew? Thanks for the education. LOL |
It’s not a secret that was the point. Not very bright, are you? LOL. |
|
|
| anon-117o |
| Posted: Mon, Jun 11 2018, 4:58 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| anon-117o wrote: |
... sneaky Indivisibles knew that not many people turn up for the primary
|
The secret is out! Low voter turnout during primaries, who knew? Thanks for the education. LOL |
|
|
| anon-834s |
| Posted: Mon, Jun 11 2018, 3:45 pm EDT Post subject: Re: Budget Article |
|
| anon-117o wrote: | Pretty impressive rant. But what's even more impressive is that a write in candidate received over 100 votes. About the same as the "known" Republican candidates.
( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°) |
Yes, it’s almost as if the sneaky Indivisibles knew that not many people turn up for the primary most of the time and that’s why the write in campaign was so hush hush until 2 days before the election and Dan Mulligan pulled the curtain back. |
|
|