Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing

Post a reply

Username

Subject

Message body

Emoticons

Font colour: Font size:

Close Tags

[quote="Court"]CRANBURY: Court revenue decreases as police staff numbers decline

David Kilby, Managing Editor

CRANBURY — The township’s ticket revenue has decreased about $65,000 since it began sharing court services with Plainsboro four years ago, but the Township Committee believes the decrease is due to the decrease in officers in the township and not due to the cost of the shared service.

”The court agreement operates on a pure revenue transfer basis, which means that Plainsboro does not charge Cranbury any fees, and in return for providing court services, they retain any ticket revenue,” said Cranbury Township Committeeman James Taylor, liaison to the court.

He said, “The sole exception is related to DUI and DWI charges that result in a guilty verdict and fine. In that case, a percentage is returned to Cranbury by state statute for the purchase of body armor. Further, there is a misconception that tickets on the Turnpike return revenue as well to Plainsboro. That is not the case. It is important to note that any tickets issued by the State Police on the Turnpike have that revenue returned to the state. Municipalities cannot retain that revenue locally. This was confirmed last year during our review process.”

At the committee meeting Monday, Mr. Taylor went over the ticket revenue Cranbury has had since beginning shared services with Plainsboro in 2008. In 2008, the Police Department had 19 officers and ticket revenue was $228,000.

In 2009, the Police Department had 19 officers for part of the year, and ticket revenue dropped to $192,000. In 2010, the township decreased the number of officers to 18, and ticket revenue fell to $176,000. In 2011, Cranbury decreased the number of officers to 17, and ticket revenue fell to $163,000.

In February 2011, the committee approached the court to determine the operational costs of the court and where Cranbury’s ticket revenue stood in relation to those costs. The court provided a line item accounting that showed the total court cost was $726,853.13 of which Cranbury’s portion was $265,301.39.

”We have approached them again this year and are awaiting the final year-end numbers,” Mr. Taylor said. “When we look at the cost breakdown, the majority of that expense, $239,409, is related to salary and benefits. The employee positions are state mandated.

The rest of the article can be read at:
http://www.centraljersey.com/articles/2012/02/10/cranbury_press/news/doc4f342cd5ba4e3298720769.txt[/quote]

Options
HTML is ON
BBCode is ON
Smilies are ON

	Disable HTML in this post
	Disable BBCode in this post
	Disable Smilies in this post