Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="anon-8117"][quote="anon-8sp4"]The difference between 2004 and today is that at that time this Country was united. Look at some of the dissidents, Un- American people who are in our Congress today, Would they have been elected when 9/11 was still raw? A Socialist Senator who is running for President? The Liberal Left wants to erase History and silence your right to bring it up. To them Hillary's " Arab Spring" and Bengazi did not happen and they wanted more of that incompetence in the last Election. Here we have Indivisible. Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all, .........except for those who disagree with us. Thanks to the Organizers of this Event. It is important to send a message to local dissidents that they cannot take over.[/quote] The difference is that the mayor back then didn't feel the need to tell everyone when they can use their free speech first amendment. And now he is protesting a rally supporting humanitarian efforts and protesting children being kept in cages in US custody, several who died under Trump? What have these children done to deserve to die? Their crime was that they walked a couple thousand miles in search of a better life? I thought Mr. Taylor was going to run the town like a well oiled machine? That is what he promised. But he can't get along with any of the boards or our neighboring town. Mr. Taylor has his opinions, and he can state them, that is his right, but why do his talking points target our civil liberties and freedom of speech. I don't see anywhere in the Constitution that our rights are limited to certain days of the year, and other days we can't exercise them. Maybe the mayor should keep his opinions to himself, stop being holier than holy, get down from his high horse, and get to work to unite the town rather than divide it and fight with everyone. He is sad that Glenn lost the election, and he is sad Dan is leaving, and he is paranoid as can be. That is his problem.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
anon-q2r7
Posted: Sat, Sep 14 2019, 8:07 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
anon-q2q6 wrote:
anon-015n wrote:
Indivisible Cranbury has wandered far from Indivisible.org.
This local chapter has focused on immigration when IMO the focus should be on the integrity and security of our electoral process.
It’s still all about taking down Trump by tugging at the heartstrings.
Question: How many of the Indivisible people protested about immigration when Obama was president?
Answer: Zero
True. I think they all live on one way streets. Invisible members are nothing more than a bunch of hypocritical scumbags.
anon-q2q6
Posted: Fri, Sep 13 2019, 6:04 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
anon-015n wrote:
Indivisible Cranbury has wandered far from Indivisible.org.
This local chapter has focused on immigration when IMO the focus should be on the integrity and security of our electoral process.
It’s still all about taking down Trump by tugging at the heartstrings.
Question: How many of the Indivisible people protested about immigration when Obama was president?
Answer: Zero
anon-015n
Posted: Fri, Sep 13 2019, 3:39 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
Indivisible Cranbury has wandered far from Indivisible.org.
This local chapter has focused on immigration when IMO the focus should be on the integrity and security of our electoral process.
anon-572n
Posted: Fri, Sep 13 2019, 9:33 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
And please don't say "Open borders" because that is just lunacy.
anon-572n
Posted: Fri, Sep 13 2019, 9:16 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
anon-qn09 wrote:
anon-q2r7 wrote:
Guest wrote:
anon-2394 wrote:
If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw
yup and when the claim asylum legally and then they are put in detention. Legal asylum seekers are being put in detention. If you deny this you are either an idiot or a liar.
So what you are saying is they enter this country illegally, get caught and claim asylum, and are put in a detention center where they belong. What is the problem?
Apparently English is not your native language, read it again. The apply for asylum legally and are then put in camps. Since you are such a legal stickler, realize that the Trump administration was told by the court to no longer separate young children yet they continue to do so. That is illegal. I await your call to have these officials put into camps because of their illegal acts.
I'm not being a troll, I'm asking sincerely. What do you suggest they do with the tens of thousands of people who came seeking asylum? Get them all rooms at the holiday inn? If 30,000 people showed up at your front door, what would you do with them, regardless of whether you believed they had the right to be there or not.
I am a Democrat, and I believe people have the right to seek asylum. I do not believe that everybody should get it just because they asked, I believe that there needs to be guidelines and protocols. I agree that the camp situation is a million miles from ideal.
But the only steps I see being taken by Indivisible is to camp out in front of government buildings screeching "Stop the hate!" And if you point out that there is a huge difference between "Hate" and "Logistical nightmare of housing unprecedented numbers of people showing up seeking asylum" you get shouted down. What is YOUR proposed solution, Dr. Zurfluh? Lead with that instead of your Indivisible approved talking points.
anon-q2r7
Posted: Fri, Sep 13 2019, 6:14 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
Where do you get your info from CNN? Ever herd of the Flores agreement? Nothing is illegal and no officials will be put in camps, only ILLEGAL immigrants. By the way may english is fine, but judging by your post you need some work on your grammar. Lastly why do you resort to name calling?
anon-qn09
Posted: Fri, Sep 13 2019, 12:33 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
anon-q2r7 wrote:
Guest wrote:
anon-2394 wrote:
If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw
yup and when the claim asylum legally and then they are put in detention. Legal asylum seekers are being put in detention. If you deny this you are either an idiot or a liar.
So what you are saying is they enter this country illegally, get caught and claim asylum, and are put in a detention center where they belong. What is the problem?
Apparently English is not your native language, read it again. The apply for asylum legally and are then put in camps. Since you are such a legal stickler, realize that the Trump administration was told by the court to no longer separate young children yet they continue to do so. That is illegal. I await your call to have these officials put into camps because of their illegal acts.
anon-5037
Posted: Thu, Sep 12 2019, 8:57 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
Good article in the Cranbury Press about the Indivisible Group protesting on 9/11. Link below.
I am not sure I understand why 9/11. No one explains that to any degree. I understand the issue and asking the leaders of our country to be more humane. I like the You know You’re from Cranbury FB page. That page is about unity and community. Why can’t we do better as a town as that page shows we are capable. why can’t we respect our township neighbors and come together like last night and as we see on that page? I saw some of our TC stand with first responders and people of the Rep and Dem parties come together last night. We are capable so why do we need to bring hate and national views to town the rest of the time whether a tea Party or Indivisible. Why can’t we let those issues stay out of town. We see our neighbors while we walk down the street shouldn’t we realize they aren’t the issue. None of us has the funds or influence to change national politics and we don’t have the votes either. So why let those issues we cannot change, make our town so divided.
http://www.centraljersey.com/news/the_cranbury_press/date-of-rally-sparks-a-debate-in-cranbury/article_d7a35010-109c-5ac3-8026-ed1d242e0315.html
anon-8991
Posted: Thu, Sep 12 2019, 7:06 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
Trump Trum Trump - He is the best.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-9-11-story-722430/
anon-8991
Posted: Thu, Sep 12 2019, 7:05 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
anon-8sp4 wrote:
Look at conditions in Democratic controlled cities like Baltimore and Newark. Children from those areas would be in better conditions at the Border holding points under this Republican Administration.
Good one Trumpy
anon-q2r7
Posted: Thu, Sep 12 2019, 5:43 am EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
Guest wrote:
anon-2394 wrote:
If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw
yup and when the claim asylum legally and then they are put in detention. Legal asylum seekers are being put in detention. If you deny this you are either an idiot or a liar.
So what you are saying is they enter this country illegally, get caught and claim asylum, and are put in a detention center where they belong. What is the problem?
Guest
Posted: Wed, Sep 11 2019, 11:06 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
anon-2394 wrote:
If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw
yup and when the claim asylum legally and then they are put in detention. Legal asylum seekers are being put in detention. If you deny this you are either an idiot or a liar.
anon-9005
Posted: Wed, Sep 11 2019, 9:19 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
anon-qn09 wrote:
anon-2394 wrote:
If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw
not True after you claim asylum at the checkpoint while the process the claim you are put into a camp
America replaced slavery with illegal immigration... cheap laborers with no rights brought in to pick the crops and serve the masters.
Consider that when you advocate for continued ILLEGAL immigration.
If you want to help the poor people of Central America, pressure congress to enact a better LEGAL immigration system.
anon-qn09
Posted: Wed, Sep 11 2019, 5:14 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
anon-2394 wrote:
If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw
not True after you claim asylum at the checkpoint while the process the claim you are put into a camp
anon-8sp4
Posted: Mon, Sep 9 2019, 5:31 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
Look at conditions in Democratic controlled cities like Baltimore and Newark. Children from those areas would be in better conditions at the Border holding points under this Republican Administration.
anon-2394
Posted: Mon, Sep 9 2019, 12:48 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: Indivisible Cranbury
If they were following the law then they should have claimed asylum at a checkpoint and not cross over illegally
https://youtu.be/ZEFoi_leYDw