Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
▪
Cranbury School
▪
Cranbury Township
▪
Cranbury Library
▪
Cranbury.org
▪
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest 2
Posted: Wed, Apr 22 2009, 6:07 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
"concerned" is 100% correct. A "no" vote most definitely does not correlate with displeasure with the board, only displeasure with the budget. I'm sorry that my note implied that it did.
concerned
Posted: Wed, Apr 22 2009, 1:12 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
A 'no' vote for the budget didn't necessarily mean that the BOE members aren't appreciated. Personally, I voted no, but have a ton of faith in the competence of the BOE. In these tough times it becomes harder and harder to pass budgets and not cut programs.
Guest 2
Posted: Tue, Apr 21 2009, 10:38 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
Thanks for the info Win. I'm glad to see that the budget passed and we have once again shown the Board that we appreciate their efforts and the hard decisions they have to make.
wcody
Posted: Tue, Apr 21 2009, 10:16 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
Results of Cranbury School Election
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION (3-YEAR TERM; VOTE FOR 3):
Austin Schraudenbach -340
Lynne Schwarz - 369
Nicole Pormilli - 353
Write-Ins:
SCHOOL BUDGET QUESTION:
YES: 274
NO: 167
Joan Rue
Posted: Tue, Apr 21 2009, 12:06 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
The budgets would go up in the typical amount. For years, the amount budgets may go up is capped - traditionally 4%. During years of extraordinary growth, the State did allow Boards that applied for a growth exception to increase their cap by the amount that was required beyond the 4% increase for that line only. So for us, the years when we were graduating between 30 and 40 children from high school, but over 60 were entering freshman year, we were granted a greater increase than the cap, but only by the amount that we actually owed in tuition. We also had an allowance the first year an addition was occupied.
I'll be honest, I can't think of any year that the budget went down or stayed flat - years when the assessed value of the Township grew with warehouses and new developments, there was also growth in the school population, meaning more teachers, classrooms, books and supplies, transportation, utilities and benefits. While the Township was able to collect fees to help offset the costs of additional inspections and reviews, most of school costs are the responsibility of the taxpayer. The Cranbury Board belongs to consortiums to buy heat, electric, and paper, and many of our special education transportation runs are bid by the County Special Services Board. We share some transportation runs to private schools with districts like East and West Windsor. We use reserve accounts and surplus to try to offset the tax burden, but it's never enough.
Guest
Posted: Tue, Apr 21 2009, 7:53 am EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
Joan,
In the 3 years when the budget was voted down since 1980, what percent did the subsequent year's school budgets increase by? Did they go up by a typical amount, more, less or stay flat?
Thank you.
Guest
Posted: Tue, Apr 21 2009, 7:10 am EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
Joan - thank you for that explanation, which is very helpful. Also, thank you for all your work on the BOE. You will be missed!
Joan Rue
Posted: Mon, Apr 20 2009, 10:03 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
Boards of Education are allowed to set aside money in three different kinds of reserve accounts- capital, tuition and maintenance, to help pay for the extra costs of capital projects, maintenance or large increases in tuition costs in future budgets. The money from a capital reserve account or a tuition reserve account cannot be used to pay for salaries, transportation, or other general operating fund line items. In April, 2008, the proposed 2008-2009 budget included a $363,422 capital outlay line which was fully funded by the capital reserve fund. So, in the tax levy of 2008-2009 of $15,216,230., the tax levy paid for the general operating costs- none of that money went to the roof replacement that was completed during the summer of 2008. In April, 2009, the proposed 2009-2010 budget includes a capital outlay line of $652,000. for the roof areas over the 1967 section of classrooms, as well as the cafeteria, and a pole barn to store items that are used by the school several times during the year, but are too large to store in any existing closet spaces(items such as risers, extra desks for testing, etc.) In addition $200,000 from tuition reserve is budgeted. and almost $400,000 from the current operating budget's unspent lines will be used to provide tax relief in 2009-2010. None of the proposed tax levy of $15,465,8529( an increase of $249,622) will be used to pay for the roof or pole barn. What didn't get spent in the 2008-2009 budget that allows us to use $400,000? There were savings in health and prescrption costs because our staff now does contribute more to their benefits; new textbooks for language arts have been postponed a year because the State has not completed writing the new curriculum standards, and major tecnology purchases are being funded by generous donations of both the PTO and the Education Foundation. The library's rent is $58,000. The rest of miscellaneous revenue is interest earned and other fees paid for use of the facility. The problem is that the school cannot make up the difference caused by the drop in assessed values of commercial property without a major cut in program.
The Board budget process begins in October when the business administrator reviews the current budget to determine which lines are over or under expended. In November, the Board's independent auditor presents the audit of the previous year's budget, as well as confirmation of the amount of money available in capital and tuition reserves, and fund balance. The auditor also checks to make sure all monies promised for tax relief have been spent. The Board then begins to work with Administration to determine what capital projects could be funded in the next year's budget. A readout of all salaries and benefits costs are reviewed in December, and then the first line item budget is presented to the finance committee. Line items are scrutinized; changes are made; in March the high school lets us know of the cost of next year's tuition. Finally, the State gives the District a State aid figure. In February, the Board made its first public presentation of the budget( no one came). With tuition and Aid firgures set, a revised budget is presented in early March, and then sent to the County's Executive Superintendent for approval. Then there is the public presentation of the budget at the end of March( Win Cody and Nick Kafasis came). The budget is then sent to the newspapers, and a copy is prepared for distribution to every household. A budget presentation is made to the PTO in April. There is another board meeting in mid-April to answer any of the public's questions( no one came).
I have attended Board meetings, or have been part of the Board since 1980. The Township Committee reduced the school's budget two out of the three times the budget was defeated. Programs such as instrumental music were reduced; late buses to the high school were eliminated; some classes had over 30 children and one teacher. The problem for the Township Committee is twofold: understanding in less than two weeks a budget it has not helped to prepare, and knowing how much of a decrease to the budget would satisfy the people who voted against it. The Board of Education does not have the money it would take to make up the difference for the change in assessed values. The only recours is to eliminate or severly curtail existing programs.
If you have not taken the time to review the budget, please do so before you vote tomorrow. A no vote could result in consequences that affect a district for several years.
Guest
Posted: Mon, Apr 20 2009, 9:27 am EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
Guest wrote:
Does anyone have info on the candidates for BOE?
I received a voting form for the BOE election in the mail. The names of the three candidates are on the form. I have not checked the Cranbury Press to see if the paper did an interview with the candidates.
Guest
Posted: Sun, Apr 19 2009, 1:54 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
Does anyone have info on the candidates for BOE?
Guest
Posted: Sun, Apr 19 2009, 9:47 am EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
I don't have an issue with the people. They are doing a very good job. I have an issue with the increase in cost this year, but the remaing part of the year they do very well. I voted yes last year. The purpose of the vote on the budgt is to provide a review if you are not comfortable with the increase.
??
Posted: Sun, Apr 19 2009, 9:15 am EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
Thanks for the info.
I think for the people who oppose the budget, the more effective way is to support their own BOE candidates, similar to the Republicans did to the TC election.
Guest 2
Posted: Sun, Apr 19 2009, 8:35 am EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
The BOE creates the budget, but gets a lot of input from the school administration. Remember the Administrators
work for
the Board of Ed as do all the staff members.
??
Posted: Sat, Apr 18 2009, 9:58 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
I am curious. Did the BOE members work with the school to come up with the budget? Or the school determined the budget and asked the BOE to review it and stamp ok?
Guest
Posted: Sat, Apr 18 2009, 9:53 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
Fine. Vote yes. I'll vote no and hope enough people are concerned that they want a simple review before forking over 250 more a year.
When we have 376K, plus rent from the library our BOE should not need an average of 240 more a year per home.
Guest 2
Posted: Sat, Apr 18 2009, 9:28 pm EDT
Post subject: Re: School Budget Presentation on 4/14/2009 (Tue)
I like your simple math.