Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing Â
[Click here to bookmark this page: http://cranbury.info]
â–ª
Cranbury School
â–ª
Cranbury Township
â–ª
Cranbury Library
â–ª
Cranbury.org
â–ª
Cranburyhistory.org
(Press Ctrl and = keys to increase font size)
Search
Register (optional)
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[http://cranbury.info]
->
News | Events
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Princeton Packet"]New push from Corzine on consolidation Wednesday, April 1, 2009 7:17 PM EDT By Fred Tuccillo, Managing Editor PRINCETON — Gov. Jon S. Corzine said Wednesday that his administration will soon take steps to increase pressure for “school districts without schools” to move toward consolidation with neighboring school systems. Answering questions from community newspaper editors at Drumthwacket, the official residence of New Jersey governors, Gov. Corzine signaled a continuing determination to press for more shared services and consolidation among the state’s 1,900 governmental units, including its more than 600 school districts. The governor acknowledged the difficulty of overcoming grass roots “home rule” resistance to municipal mergers, citing as one example voter rejection of past efforts at merging Princeton Township and Princeton Borough into a single municipality. However, he said that the recession’s impact on governmental revenue and his administration’s insistence on capping increases in municipal and school district budgets were beginning to create a new atmosphere for such efforts. ”We’re going to keep pushing on it as long as I am governor,” he said. “That’s one of the reasons we put the cap on.” Of municipal consolidation in particular, Gov. Corzine said, “I do believe in ‘small d’ democracy. People ought to vote on it and they ought to vote their own self-interest.” But he then added: “We have a stronger authority with respect to schools and we will be exercising it ... in a matter of weeks.” He did not elaborate, except to make clear that he was referring to some 16 school districts that have no schools or students of their own and merely arrange to send children to schools in larger neighboring districts. He was asked to respond to the argument that such districts need their own school boards and administrators to ensure that larger “receiving districts” are spending appropriately on the students they receive from smaller communities. ”You would think that you could put together a system that watches out for the spending and the education of the children without having to have another administration,” Gov. Corzine said. The governor said that the multiplicity of governments and districts of all kinds in New Jersey is “one of our biggest problems on cost and, I think, on corruption ... so many units and levels without transparency.” He said that public resistance to consolidation was, in part, due to “a historic failure of political courage. It will only change when people feel and are convinced by their political leadership. ... People have to vote for the people that they think will make this change.” The governor used much of the 75-minute session to defend his $29.8 billion budget, arguing that he had made unprecedented spending reductions — totaling $4 billion — while protecting funding that “supports the middle class.” He singled out the retention of property tax rebates for seniors and those making less than $75,000 a year as well as the maintenance of school aid levels. He noted that the state’s median annual income is $65,000, adding, “And the last time I checked, a lot of seniors were in the middle class.” Citing the connection between state aid to education and local property taxes, Gov. Corzine said, “If you are putting more money into the schools, you are doing more to dampen property taxes than anything else you could do.” He said that the state’s challenge in maintaining “the safety net” for those most severely impacted by the recession, while coping with a 12 percent drop in its own revenues, had forced “a lot of choices I am not happy with.” But he challenged critics to come up with specific alternatives, saying, “They don’t generally tell you what they would have cut instead.” He also defended the budget’s provision allowing municipalities to defer this year’s contribution to the state pension fund, arguing that it differed from much-criticized deferrals by previous state administrations. The difference, he said, is that this provision lays out a payback requirement and schedule. ”This is not my favorite option but it is the only way, I feel, that we can support our municipalities during this economic crisis,” the governor said. “And it’s completely voluntary — if a municipality doesn’t want to do it, it doesn’t have to.” ”The bond and stock markets will have a far greater impact on the pension system than these deferrals,” he said. “The drawdown is very small, compared to the swings that go on in the market ... and all of it could be completely washed away if the stock market comes up.” http://www.centraljersey.com/articles/2009/04/01/topstory/doc49d3f51f5150c759370503.txt[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Topics
----------------
News | Events
School | Parenting
Blogs by Cranbury Residents
Shopping | Good Deals | Price Talk
Home Sweet Home
House For Sale
Home Sales Pricing Records
Financial | Stocks | Mutual Funds
Cool Bytes & Bits
Garage Sale | ForSale Ads | Things to Trade
Tech Related (PC, Internet, HDTV, etc.)
Interesing and Fun Stuff to Share
What's Your Favorite?
Interests | Hobbies
Cranbury History
Radom Thoughts | Sports | Kitchen Sink
Amazon Deals
Local Business Info
----------------
Local Business Ads (FREE)
Support
----------------
Daily Sponsored Message & Amazon Ads
About Us | Your Privacy | Suggestion | Sponsored
Test Area (Practice your posting skills here)
Topic review
Author
Message
Guest
Posted: Fri, Apr 3 2009, 11:31 am EDT
Post subject: Re: New push from Corzine on consolidation
Princeton Packet wrote:
Gov. Jon S. Corzine said Wednesday that his administration will soon take steps to increase pressure for “school districts without schools” to move toward consolidation with neighboring school systems.
Answering questions from community newspaper editors at Drumthwacket, the official residence of New Jersey governors, Gov. Corzine signaled a continuing determination to press for more shared services and consolidation among the state’s 1,900 governmental units, including its more than 600 school districts. The governor acknowledged the difficulty of overcoming grass roots “home rule” resistance to municipal mergers, citing as one example voter rejection of past efforts at merging Princeton Township and Princeton Borough into a single municipality.
”We’re going to keep pushing on it as long as I am governor,” he said. “That’s one of the reasons we put the cap on.”
But he then added: “We have a stronger authority with respect to schools and we will be exercising it ... in a matter of weeks.” He did not elaborate, except to make clear that he was referring to some 16 school districts that have no schools or students of their own and merely arrange to send children to schools in larger neighboring districts.
Does anyone know if Princeton Borough and Princeton Township merge, how will this affect the Cranbury HS students?
Also, Corzine stated that 16 towns have no children or school systems and use have arrangements with neighboring districts - Isn't that consolidation? Or is he trying to merge complete towns? If this is the case, will he want Cranbury to merge completely with another neighboring township? Perhaps Plainsboro or South Brunswick?
Princeton Packet
Posted: Thu, Apr 2 2009, 11:40 am EDT
Post subject: New push from Corzine on consolidation
New push from Corzine on consolidation
Wednesday, April 1, 2009 7:17 PM EDT
By Fred Tuccillo, Managing Editor
PRINCETON — Gov. Jon S. Corzine said Wednesday that his administration will soon take steps to increase pressure for “school districts without schools” to move toward consolidation with neighboring school systems.
Answering questions from community newspaper editors at Drumthwacket, the official residence of New Jersey governors, Gov. Corzine signaled a continuing determination to press for more shared services and consolidation among the state’s 1,900 governmental units, including its more than 600 school districts. The governor acknowledged the difficulty of overcoming grass roots “home rule” resistance to municipal mergers, citing as one example voter rejection of past efforts at merging Princeton Township and Princeton Borough into a single municipality.
However, he said that the recession’s impact on governmental revenue and his administration’s insistence on capping increases in municipal and school district budgets were beginning to create a new atmosphere for such efforts.
”We’re going to keep pushing on it as long as I am governor,” he said. “That’s one of the reasons we put the cap on.”
Of municipal consolidation in particular, Gov. Corzine said, “I do believe in ‘small d’ democracy. People ought to vote on it and they ought to vote their own self-interest.”
But he then added: “We have a stronger authority with respect to schools and we will be exercising it ... in a matter of weeks.” He did not elaborate, except to make clear that he was referring to some 16 school districts that have no schools or students of their own and merely arrange to send children to schools in larger neighboring districts.
He was asked to respond to the argument that such districts need their own school boards and administrators to ensure that larger “receiving districts” are spending appropriately on the students they receive from smaller communities.
”You would think that you could put together a system that watches out for the spending and the education of the children without having to have another administration,” Gov. Corzine said.
The governor said that the multiplicity of governments and districts of all kinds in New Jersey is “one of our biggest problems on cost and, I think, on corruption ... so many units and levels without transparency.”
He said that public resistance to consolidation was, in part, due to “a historic failure of political courage. It will only change when people feel and are convinced by their political leadership. ... People have to vote for the people that they think will make this change.”
The governor used much of the 75-minute session to defend his $29.8 billion budget, arguing that he had made unprecedented spending reductions — totaling $4 billion — while protecting funding that “supports the middle class.”
He singled out the retention of property tax rebates for seniors and those making less than $75,000 a year as well as the maintenance of school aid levels. He noted that the state’s median annual income is $65,000, adding, “And the last time I checked, a lot of seniors were in the middle class.”
Citing the connection between state aid to education and local property taxes, Gov. Corzine said, “If you are putting more money into the schools, you are doing more to dampen property taxes than anything else you could do.”
He said that the state’s challenge in maintaining “the safety net” for those most severely impacted by the recession, while coping with a 12 percent drop in its own revenues, had forced “a lot of choices I am not happy with.”
But he challenged critics to come up with specific alternatives, saying, “They don’t generally tell you what they would have cut instead.”
He also defended the budget’s provision allowing municipalities to defer this year’s contribution to the state pension fund, arguing that it differed from much-criticized deferrals by previous state administrations. The difference, he said, is that this provision lays out a payback requirement and schedule.
”This is not my favorite option but it is the only way, I feel, that we can support our municipalities during this economic crisis,” the governor said. “And it’s completely voluntary — if a municipality doesn’t want to do it, it doesn’t have to.”
”The bond and stock markets will have a far greater impact on the pension system than these deferrals,” he said. “The drawdown is very small, compared to the swings that go on in the market ... and all of it could be completely washed away if the stock market comes up.”
http://www.centraljersey.com/articles/2009/04/01/topstory/doc49d3f51f5150c759370503.txt