Cranbury Forum | Bulletin | Info Sharing :: Topic review

anon-87oq

Original poster, why don’t you share what organization you joined to bring about needed change?

anon-p824

anon-106r

Sorry, I forgot you do t know how to use Google. Links fixed...

anon-7ns6

None of your links work, not surprisingly. Still waiting for something updating this story that actually provides any independent verification of the restaurant owner's allegation.

Short of that, it's interesting you are taking the restaurant owner's allegation as fact. Why?

The only verifiable fact in the article was that the restaurant owner's employee's fingerprint was on the flier. That employee said they were following the orders of the owner. That owner, according to the first article in this post, was actively campaigning against the people denigrated in the fliers. But he wants us to believe the people denigrated themselves using his restaurant and employee to do it without his knowledge. Those are the only facts presented so far.

Why do you continue to now address that? What is your agenda? Why not simply logically follow the available facts?

anon-106r

anon-7ns6

1) Is there a more recent story than this over 4 month old one? If so, why was it not posted?

2) What does this have to do with Cranbury in any possible way?

3) The story doesn't even say what the poster here alleges it does. If you read the full report, the only person who has been implicated in the sending of the racist fliers is an employee of the restaurant who in turn said he was doing it at the direction of his boss the restaurant owner. That owner, who according to the article actively campaigned against the people maligned in the racist fliers, in turn claimed he had allowed them to process the fliers for the mail in his restaurant but that he otherwise had nothing to do with it. And somehow, the employees he had working on it had no first hand knowledge of the rest of these people he allegedly let do it in his restaurant. It seems like an incredibly unlikely and weak allegation. We're supposed to believe that a bunch of people asked someone who they knew was actively opposed to their campaign and ran an organization they believe had a history of racist sentiment against them to let them borrow his restaurant to send fake fliers that would have the effect of generating sympathy for the people who opposed in the election, and that at some other point he used his own employees on his dime to further prepare these fliers, all while being unaware of their content.

LOL.

anon-106r

anon-r345

anon-ro8s

anon-106r