Cranbury to Crack down on Speeding

[Guest]

^^^

LOL that the above poster accused someone else of having a chip on their shoulder and anger issues. Funny stuff. The best part is imagining what this person is like in-person.

[Guest]

Lol, how do I have anger issues or a chip on my shoulder for making a factual post on something? You were the one who made an insulting post instead of contributing something. That tells me you have an emotional investment in this matter and you don't like my point of view, but you refuse to think it through. I simply support speed limits based on the 85th percentile rule because these are backed up by many studies. I don't support the notion that putting speed limits as low as possible improves safety, because it's been dis proven many times and this knowledge is easily available to anyone who wants to read up on the subject. How old are you, 30 or 40 something? Why not act like an adult?

[Guest]

Why does everything here have to be a stupid emotionally charged flame war....I'm just trying to state factual information similarly to how there is strong scientific evidence for evolution, etc. I mean, if you don't like my view, go read up on the subject and see for yourself. Or if you can't tolerate my posts, just don't read them.

[Guest]

You're confusing me with other posters. But LOL that you are so charged up about this that you keep having to post twice in a row. It's like you finish one and you're still so worked up you have to keep going. And you don't even realize how you come across. No one is reading you as a dispassionate scientist in this.

[Guest]

I don't really care if you're reading me as a dispassionate 'scientist'...you're clearly too emotional about the issue to view it in a scientific mindset....I can't edit my posts so I posted another one. Big friggin deal. Looks like you're reading too much into this. You have so much of a problem with me being against slow speed limits, but you're totally okay with soccer moms screaming to get speed limits lowered for years on end. Whose more obsessive?

[Guest]

Mr. Two Posts

There once was a man from Cranbury…
Or was it Plainsboro?
Or Lawrenceville?
Or a Cadillac Deville?

No matter
Because the Mad Hatter
Just had to go faster
To avoid a traffic disaster

The world just was not right
Unless his intellectual might
Was displayed not once at a time but twice
For those of us with brains of mice

If only we could appreciate
And fully differentiate
Between the 85 percentile
And the rants of a juvenile

He is a man on a mission
But not to save on emissions
He must make us all understand
That he alone is in command

God bless 50 miles per hour. Anything less is un-American.

Thank you for your wisdom Mr. Two Posts.

[Guest]

Okay, get this. This guy spends hours thinking up some shitty 'poem' to insult me because he's so butt hurt over my views, and I'm the no life loser for posting facts about traffic engineering or I'm the 'OCD' for posting twice because I can't edit a post. Right. You can bet your house that this loser wouldn't be going so far out of its way to insult me and act like a smart ass if this was someone strongly arguing for something it approved of. Pseudo-trolling some low traffic forum pretty much means you have no life at all.

[Guest]

This thread had long outlasted its usefulness. Now it is just a venue to taunt each other. Shut this baby down.

[ikons698]

I sure hope you're not the guy who posted that thing, which would be hilarious.

I'm assuming you're not (can't tell whose who very much here) but yeah, this thread should be closed. And the flamer/troll should be banned. I guess my views irritate a lot of people, but I'm civil about them.

[Guest]

[Guest]

[Guest]

[Guest]

I don't know if he was banned but the moderator locked his topic out last year:

http://www.cranbury.info/viewtopic.php?t=4088&start=112

And whoever called him two posts is right on. He was running two topics at once then just like now.

http://www.cranbury.info/viewtopic.php?t=4009&start=96

It seems to be a summer thing. I wonder if he is either a teacher or more likely a student.

[Guest]

I'm 68 years old /sarcasm

Yeah, I should totally be banned for posting contrary views. I don't remember being banned though, lol.

[Guest]

[Guest]

I'm responding to different people and trying to explain things in more elaborate ways when they might misunderstand....this is almost a year later why should I assume that possibly new posters have read it?