Linda Greenstein and COAH
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [http://cranbury.info] -> News | Events
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Sat, Oct 29 2011, 7:50 pm EDT    Post subject: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

In addition to the Cranbury township committee, there is an election for our state representatives. Remember that Linda Greenstein, along with her running mate Wayne DeAngelo, continue not to be supportive of fixing COAH. Rather than vote against the damaging A100 bill a couple of years ago, she would not go against her party and abstained from voting. Wayne DeAngelo supported the bill. This has been heavily documented on the board:

http://cranbury.info/viewtopic.php?t=3674&highlight=greenstein

When Linda Greenstein got into the senate this year, she became the key addition to the Senate allowing Lesniak to modify the S1 bill so it was no longer advantageous and Governor needed to veto the bill.


Affordable housing bill ekes out 21 votes in Senate
By Timothy J. Carroll | January 10th, 2011 - 7:41pm
|More


TRENTON – Amendments were being made to S1 seemingly moments before a Senate vote today.

State Sen. Ron Rice, Sr. (D-Newark) took his vote off the board as he spoke on the bill – surprising the Dems as they were counting on both hands – but they re-grouped mid-vote and pulled new state Sen. Linda Greenstein (D-Plainsboro) on the bill.

One of Gov. Chris Christie’s main reform topics, in its original form S1 would have overhauled the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) with a coalition of support, but state Sen. Ray Lesniak (D-Elizabeth) has been a determined architect focused on finding a constitutional and agreeable reform. The measure will greatly reduce the unattainable and hefty load of affordable housing requirements of municipalities..

The measure passed the Senate in June with strong bipartisan support, but amendments made after that lost Republicans in the Assembly.

Today, Lesniak’s amendment process took all Republicans off the board.

http://www.politickernj.com/44052/affordable-housing-bill-ekes-out-21-votes-senate

COAH obligations are still with us and we need representatives that will support Cranbury, unlike Greenstein and DeAngelo have historically proven.

Wayne Wittman will support Cranbury in the assembly, as he has always done, in the fight to control COAH impact as will Richard Kanka in the Senate.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat, Oct 29 2011, 8:29 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Let's keep our own Cranbury tea party republican Wayne Wittman right here in Cranbury where he can do no harm

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=townhall%20wayne%20wittman%20tax&source=web&cd=6&sqi=2&ved=0CDkQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcranburyconservative.blogtownhall.com%2F2009%2F04%2F15%2Ftax_day_tea_party_2009_at_the_cranbury_inn.thtml&ei=jpmsTtGwFqTz0gGJsOibDw&usg=AFQjCNGmdzxNgbcS1NZKUoAB4q2dll1Kdg
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat, Oct 29 2011, 9:03 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Guest wrote:
Let's keep our own Cranbury tea party republican Wayne Wittman right here in Cranbury where he can do no harm

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=townhall%20wayne%20wittman%20tax&source=web&cd=6&sqi=2&ved=0CDkQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcranburyconservative.blogtownhall.com%2F2009%2F04%2F15%2Ftax_day_tea_party_2009_at_the_cranbury_inn.thtml&ei=jpmsTtGwFqTz0gGJsOibDw&usg=AFQjCNGmdzxNgbcS1NZKUoAB4q2dll1Kdg


LOL. Talk about someone with only one note to sing. You have been posting this same link on posts over and over for 2 years. You've never been able to come up with any real evidence or more current links that any of the people you have accused with it -- which is basically anyone republican -- is actually a tea party member, including Dan Mulligan who was the author of the original post but who has proven himself a moderate on the TC. And other posters have thoroughly discredited its relevance but that hasn't stopped you.

Your consistent silliness says a lot more about you than the people you are posting about. I feel sorry for you a little.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat, Oct 29 2011, 9:17 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Guest wrote:
Let's keep our own Cranbury tea party republican Wayne Wittman right here in Cranbury where he can do no harm

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=townhall%20wayne%20wittman%20tax&source=web&cd=6&sqi=2&ved=0CDkQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcranburyconservative.blogtownhall.com%2F2009%2F04%2F15%2Ftax_day_tea_party_2009_at_the_cranbury_inn.thtml&ei=jpmsTtGwFqTz0gGJsOibDw&usg=AFQjCNGmdzxNgbcS1NZKUoAB4q2dll1Kdg


Tea Party Attack YAWN.

Greenstein However also voted against pension reform for State Workers. So not only is she pro building more low income housing in Cranbury she also wants to keep giving away our taxes to the State employee unions. Nancy Pelosi, excuse me did I get confused I mean Linda Greenstein is a democratic party puppet.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/06/nj_senate_panel_approves_pensi.html

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/06/nj_pension_reform_vote_reveals.html
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat, Oct 29 2011, 9:33 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Please sign me up as a supporter of Wayne Wittman. Wayne gets it and would do an infinitely better job than. DeAngelo.

However, Kanka, not so much. His experience is less than one term on the Hamilton school board. He has not distinguished himself in a less than distinguished district. I am kind of lost as to why the party would put him up for state senate other than name recognition.

Stating that Linda Greenstein,"... is pro building low income housing in Cranbury..." Is at best a gross misrepresentation of facts. At worst basically an outright lie.

As someone who has been watching our state level politicians for 25 years or so, if you don't see a difference between Wayne DeAngelo and Linda Greenstein you either aren't paying attention or you are a complete dolt.

My recomendation is to vote for Wittman, he is a good man. Vote for Greenstein, she can be reasoned with and Kanka has no experience at any level and from seeing his campaign adds offers nothing except Meagan's law to recommend himself. The real trick is the other assembly position. Bensen has done nothing to distinguish himself and seems to be basically a hack and Mcgowan seems to be a complete nonentity, who was only put on the ticket when Fried bowed out due to health concerns.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat, Oct 29 2011, 11:36 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Guest wrote:
Please sign me up as a supporter of Wayne Wittman. Wayne gets it and would do an infinitely better job than. DeAngelo.

However, Kanka, not so much. His experience is less than one term on the Hamilton school board. He has not distinguished himself in a less than distinguished district. I am kind of lost as to why the party would put him up for state senate other than name recognition.

Stating that Linda Greenstein,"... is pro building low income housing in Cranbury..." Is at best a gross misrepresentation of facts. At worst basically an outright lie.

As someone who has been watching our state level politicians for 25 years or so, if you don't see a difference between Wayne DeAngelo and Linda Greenstein you either aren't paying attention or you are a complete dolt.

My recomendation is to vote for Wittman, he is a good man. Vote for Greenstein, she can be reasoned with and Kanka has no experience at any level and from seeing his campaign adds offers nothing except Meagan's law to recommend himself. The real trick is the other assembly position. Bensen has done nothing to distinguish himself and seems to be basically a hack and Mcgowan seems to be a complete nonentity, who was only put on the ticket when Fried bowed out due to health concerns.


I agree with you that DeAngelo is different than Greenstein. He is outright working for the builders interests as a paid union employee and doesn't care about Cranbury at all. But you do give Greenstein too much credit. She's at best a cliche pure politician who does everything for her own gain with the interests of her constituents only being served when that happens to coincide with her self interest. In practice that means she is a loyal "party member" who votes however her political bosses tell her to vote even when that is opposed to our local interests. She voted in favor of a school consolidation bill, she abstained on a bill supporting COAH, etc. The excuse her local party apologists give is her being loyal to the party bosses will eventually help us but show a material way that has happened?
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun, Oct 30 2011, 1:03 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Guest wrote:
Let's keep our own Cranbury tea party republican Wayne Wittman right here in Cranbury where he can do no harm

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=townhall%20wayne%20wittman%20tax&source=web&cd=6&sqi=2&ved=0CDkQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcranburyconservative.blogtownhall.com%2F2009%2F04%2F15%2Ftax_day_tea_party_2009_at_the_cranbury_inn.thtml&ei=jpmsTtGwFqTz0gGJsOibDw&usg=AFQjCNGmdzxNgbcS1NZKUoAB4q2dll1Kdg


I found this info helpful. Even though Wayne was great for Cranbury and he's a nice guy, I don't support him going to Trenton.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun, Oct 30 2011, 1:49 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

This board has argued forever about Greenstein, D'angelo, and Wittman. I would actually like to see opinions on Kanka, Bensen and McGowan. I know next to nothing about these three.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun, Oct 30 2011, 2:23 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Richard Kanka is father of Megan Kanka, who was murdered, and it inspired him to push for Megan's Law nationally. He also served on the Hamilton School Board.

The website for Kanka, Wittman and McGowan is
http://www.kankawittmanmcgowan.com/
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun, Oct 30 2011, 7:19 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Guest wrote:
Richard Kanka is father of Megan Kanka, who was murdered, and it inspired him to push for Megan's Law nationally. He also served on the Hamilton School Board.

The website for Kanka, Wittman and McGowan is
http://www.kankawittmanmcgowan.com/


That is not what I am asking. I am asking what he has done. I know he is on the Hamilton board. He does not appear to have distinguished himself in anyway. Moreover, that is one of the most disfunctional boards in Mercer County famous for its nepotism. I assume he is against the nepotism, but what has he done to stop it? I know the superintendent search just blew up in their faces. What was his role in it? I don't know. I honestly know nothing about the man that would indicate why I should vote for him for NJ senate.

What is amazing is that I have never heard of McGowan at all.

To attempt to be bipartisan in mine negativity, I know nothing about Bensen either.

I would never vote for D'Angelo. I see no reason to vote for Kanka. I think Wayne would be great. I think Linda is fine. But I am stumped at who to vote for in the second assembly seat.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun, Oct 30 2011, 9:14 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Let's keep our own Cranbury tea party republican Wayne Wittman right here in Cranbury where he can do no harm

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=townhall%20wayne%20wittman%20tax&source=web&cd=6&sqi=2&ved=0CDkQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcranburyconservative.blogtownhall.com%2F2009%2F04%2F15%2Ftax_day_tea_party_2009_at_the_cranbury_inn.thtml&ei=jpmsTtGwFqTz0gGJsOibDw&usg=AFQjCNGmdzxNgbcS1NZKUoAB4q2dll1Kdg


I found this info helpful. Even though Wayne was great for Cranbury and he's a nice guy, I don't support him going to Trenton.


Nice try. Your obviously the same poster who posted the link agreeing with yourself. No one else, regardless of which party the support, would really find a 2 year old link that has already been posted here dozens of times over the years and which has already been dissected to death and discredited helpful.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun, Oct 30 2011, 9:19 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Tea Party YAWN! Its the only fall back complaint you and the other far left hard core dems have in town. Please come up with something else anything else. We all know Linda is in the pocket of the state employee and teacher unions and is going to win. You can go back to watching MSNBC now.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun, Oct 30 2011, 9:51 pm EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Guest wrote:
Tea Party YAWN! Its the only fall back complaint you and the other far left hard core dems have in town. Please come up with something else anything else. We all know Linda is in the pocket of the state employee and teacher unions and is going to win. You can go back to watching MSNBC now.


You still have not given me a reason to vote for Kanka.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Mon, Oct 31 2011, 7:51 am EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Tea Party YAWN! Its the only fall back complaint you and the other far left hard core dems have in town. Please come up with something else anything else. We all know Linda is in the pocket of the state employee and teacher unions and is going to win. You can go back to watching MSNBC now.


You still have not given me a reason to vote for Kanka.


The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Greenstein's voting record has proven herself at best useless to Cranbury and at times an enemy.

But seriously, none of this matters anyway. Greenstein is an incumbent and in this state that means she could show up at our parade and walk down Main Street giving everyone the finger and cursing at them and she would get reelected.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Mon, Oct 31 2011, 8:34 am EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Tea Party YAWN! Its the only fall back complaint you and the other far left hard core dems have in town. Please come up with something else anything else. We all know Linda is in the pocket of the state employee and teacher unions and is going to win. You can go back to watching MSNBC now.


You still have not given me a reason to vote for Kanka.


The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Greenstein's voting record has proven herself at best useless to Cranbury and at times an enemy.

But seriously, none of this matters anyway. Greenstein is an incumbent and in this state that means she could show up at our parade and walk down Main Street giving everyone the finger and cursing at them and she would get reelected.


I actually disagree. If the republicans gave us someone to vote for I think Linda would lose. I still don't understand why they gave Baroni that worthless position at the Port Authority. I think he would have been a good candidate to challenge Holt or maybe take a shot at statewide office, now he will never be heard from again.

Truthfully, I think Wittman would have been a better candidate on the top of the ticket than Kanka. I have not seen Kanka. His ad campaign is pathetic, and I swear to you start looking through the Hamilton BOE minutes, this guy is a mystery.
Back to top
Jeff M.
Guest





PostPosted: Mon, Oct 31 2011, 8:48 am EDT    Post subject: Re: Linda Greenstein and COAH Reply with quote

All I know is Wayne should get 100% of our vote. We should vote to represent our local interests first and who better to do that than someone who lives here and sat on our TC. I would say the same whether Dem or Rep so don't try to make my post political.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [http://cranbury.info] -> News | Events All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2